Science-based policy is pretty difficult to do, but I support the notion.

But when is science conjecture taking the place of science? I know that this guy is not being quoted directly, but paraphrased by a reporter. That has been done to me enough that I know this strips what a person actually says of any nuance... but still something about the following statement makes me very comfortable.

To read the rest, you will need to prove that you are not a brain sucking AI web -scraper by registering!

This post is for subscribers only

Already have an account? Sign in.

Science Conjecture in Science policy